I thought it was interesting to read from the Library Journal article that regarding
e-book budgets, 17% will be taken from the Reference budget (2013, 5). This
ensures that more reference items will be available via databases. At my local
library the use of e-books is growing though they have more technical questions
as to how to download items on their particular device. My library uses
Overdrive which is to accommodate various types of e-readers (Nook, Kindle,
Sony Reader) and tablets. Currently we have more audiobooks being checked out
than e-books. Viewing how patrons are accessing e-books they prefer to download
these materials on their own (36).
I was most impressed with the e-book categories
graph in the article (43). More nonfiction titles need to be included and I
liked that foreign language items were highly regarded. E-books and young adult titles are the trend.
The in-demand book genres match what is at my library for both e-books and
audiobooks, leading with Bestsellers, Mystery/Suspense, and Romance (45). After meeting with a cataloger from my local public
library she told me that both erotic and religious-based romances in these
formats were being checked out regularly. Regarding nonfiction Self-Help, Business,
Biographies, Cooking, Weight Loss, and Travel are also popular.
I was surprised by the 65% of those libraries
surveyed not wanting to purchase e-book titles from e-book originals or
self-published e-books (51). I think this will change in the future; since
several young adult and graphic novels come from independent publishers they
should be considered as well. I already see e-book collections promoted on my
library’s catalog and was impressed by the how word of mouth helps market these
items (56). A few patrons from my library access the catalog from their
smartphone so they may be checking out e-books independently. Personally I have
seen e-books promoted on blogs and not displays. The awareness of e-book
availability is a very important factor to libraries (59).
Patron-driven acquisition seems to be another
growing trend (82). For me, the take home use of e-readers would depend on the
patron’s history (fines, damaged items, etc.). At this time libraries should
include both books and e-books. In house circulation statistics are important
to have when purchasing these items. Staff training on how to answer technical
questions and use the e-book downloading service as well as weeding these items
is crucial. It is vital that both small and large libraries can provide e-book
lending as a service because the demand is clearly there for all regions
surveyed in the article.
What I did not see in this survey was any statistics
regarding patrons with disabilities. Although e-books “present great potential
for users with print disabilities”, e-book publishers have created e-books and
e-readers that are “inaccessible to those with visual, hearing or learning
disabilities” (Junus, 2012, 22). From Junus’s research, Amazon’s Kindle allowed
the most access to e-text formats (i.e., EPUB, PDF, DOC, Txt, HTML, etc.); the
Kindle Fire with App, Barnes and Noble Nook Tablet, and Apple iBook e-readers
included DAISY (Digital Accessible Information System) (25). In this study the Amazon Kindle was most
accessible and I was glad to read that users prefer the .PDF format. I wear
glasses and prefer articles this way for the white adequate spacing around
text, the use of pictures, and zoom in features for PDF files. Patrons with
disabilities may need to know how to download Apps as this is becoming the
trend and cost-effective.
Resources
Junus,
A.G.R. (2012, October). E-books and E-readers for users with print
disabilities.Library Technology Reports,
48(7), 22-28.
Library Journal.
(2013). Ebook usage in U.S. public
libraries [PDF document]. Retrieved from:
